Sunday, April 5, 2020

                      Jeremiah and the Reform of Josiah


     Some things are conspicuous by their absence.   In Tanach for example there is the conspicuous silence by  Elijah on the golden calf icons at Bethel and Dan which were placed by  Jereboam.   One would expect Elijah who was such a zealot against idolatry to have said something about the golden calves.  Yet he is totally silent.  Similarly silent is the prophet  Jeremiah as to the reform of  Josiah . 

     In the eighteenth year of Josiah's reign a “book of the law” was found during renovations to the Temple.  The book of Melachim (Kings) tells the story of how this inspired King Josiah to “clean house” religiously.   He removed the Asherah from the Temple. He removed all the elements of foreign worship that had infected Judaism during the reign of previous kings.  He closed all the peripheral open air sanctuaries and centralized all worship to the Temple in Jerusalem.  Due to the collapsing Assyrian empire he was able to go into what was formerly the Northern kingdom, which had been an Assyrian province, and remove the priests of the peripheral sanctuaries and destroy the cult site at Bethel which had the golden calf. 

     All the things that Josiah corrected were in the book of the law which most scholars say is the book of Dvarim (Deuteronomy).  It appears that the book and its teaching had been sequestered at some point so that the knowledge of its content was lost to the majority.  Upon reading the book Josiah was shocked at how the nation had lost its understanding of G-d's teaching.   Josiah's reform was probably one of the most significant religious events since the giving of the Torah.  And yet Jeremiah, the greatest prophet of his time, is silent about it.  The question is why. 
   
  To answer the question we have to consider the timeline.  Jeremiah  begins his career in the thirteenth year of the reign of Josiah.  The book of the law was found in the eighteenth year of his reign.  There are scholars that question this chronology and in any event the bulk of his active ministry is later after the death of Josiah.  But if the chronology is correct, Jeremiah would be a relative newcomer to the community of prophets in Jerusalem.  In fact he mat have been still living in Anathoth.  This might explain why Josiah goes to the prophetess Hulda and not to Yirmiyahu to validate the book of the law.   Another reason is that it not the nature of prophets to give out "gold stars" for good behavior.  They rarely compliment the nation for good behavior.  They are primarily critical of bad behavior. So Jeremiah may have been silent about it even if he approved.
     There may be another aspect to this which is somewhat speculative.  Yirmiyahu comes from the village of Anathoth which is a few miles from Jerusalem in the territory of Benjamin.  There is in the book of Jeremiah 11: 19-23 a difficult passage describing how men of Anathoth wanted to kill Jeremiah.  These verses are somewhat intrusive as they do  not follow smoothly from the preceding verses.  The question is why did the people of his own town want to kill Jeremiah?  The town of Anathoth was town specifically for cohanim (priests).  Is it possible that these cohanim were officiants at the local sanctuaries- the bamot.  The cohen Eviatar who was one of two cohanim for King David.  He was exiled by King Solomon because he supported Adoniyahu, and not Solomon in the succession story.  He was also a descendant of the priest Eli from the Tabernacle at Shiloh.  The line of Eli was told by G-d that they would not continue because of their sins.  This line of priests likely made up a part of the priests at the local sanctuaries.  With the Josianic reform they were out of their jobs.  Thus it may be that Jeremiah supported the reform of Yoshiyahu and thereby incurred the wrath of his neighbors in Anathoth. So possibly his approval of the religious reform was left out of his writings for this reason.   So although there no textual evidence for this theory, the circumstantial evidence is intriguing.

Friday, February 28, 2020


Rating King Solomon

Most of the kings of Judah and of Israel are rated in the book of Melachim (Kings 1 and 2). The kings of Israel, the northern kingdom are rated on whether they promoted idolatry and particularly whether they followed in the sins of Yeravam ( Jereboam). This refers to retaining the golden calves which he had instituted at Bethel and at Dan. The Judean kings are rated on how well they walked in the footsteps of their ancestor David. Their rating goes down if they allow elements of idolatry to pervade their kingdom. But the author of Kings is also particularly concerned with eliminating the bamot- the local sanctuaries that existed at the time of the first Beit Ha Mikdash (the Temple in Jerusalem). These bamot were considered illegitimate as worship could only be done, according to the Torah, at the temple in Jerusalem.
Two kings -Chizkiahu (Hezekiah) and Yoshiahu (Josiah) get particularly good reviews in Kings because they made strong efforts to eliminate the peripheral sanctuaries.
King Solomon is gets mixed reviews in the book of Kings. He is noted as the builder of the Temple and of other sites in Jerusalem. However he carries some heavy theological baggage. He had 700 wives and 300 concubines. He had thousands of horses. He had great riches. In some cultures this would all be considered positive. In the Torah however the king is forbidden all these things. But the worst is that he built sanctuaries for his foreign wives so that they could worship the foreign gods of their native homelands and he ultimately turned to the idol worship of the surrounding nations. So the final mark for king Solomon is a failing grade as given by the author of the book of Kings.
On the other hand in the book of Divrei Ha Yamim (Chronicles) Solomon (and his father David) have all the bad things in their record expunged. Chronicles does not not mention Davids affair with Bathsheba, or his giving over the descendants of Saul to the Gibeonites. The book does not mention the many wives or the idolatry of Solomon . So why this diversity of opinion between the two biblical books?
The answer seems to be dependent on the audience that each book is addressing. The book of Kings came to final form in the last dark days of the kingdom of Judah and into the exile. This book explains why the kingdom of David split into two and why things went so wrong for Judah. The kingdom is destroyed and the people exiled because of the sin of idolatry especially on the part of the monarchs who were either complacent or actively participated in foreign worship for various reasons political and social. So it serves the purpose of the book to put in full view the transgressions of the kings and his subjects.
The book of Chronicles, on the other hand, is addressing the community which returned from Babylonia. Chronicles came to final form around 400 BCE, more than a hundred years after the return of the exiles with Zerubavel. The community is struggling to gain its footing in the land which is new for most of the returnees. For the returnees, who were all from Judah, the restoration of the Davidic dynasty and its religious institutions is a hope which still lives. So it serves no purpose for the Chronicler to air the past transgressions of the Davidic monarchs.
Hence the difference in the two books view of Solomon is based on the needs of their respective readers.